Gender-specific effects of artificially induced gender beliefs in mental rotation
Learning and Individual Differences. Bd. 22. H. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2012 S. 350 - 353
Erscheinungsjahr: 2012
ISBN/ISSN: 1041-6080
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Sprache: Englisch
Doi/URN: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.004
Geprüft | Bibliothek |
Inhaltszusammenfassung
Men outperform women in the Mental Rotation Test (MRT) by about one standard deviation. The present study replicated a gender belief account [Moè, A., & Pazzaglia, F. (2006). Following the instructions! Effects of gender beliefs in mental rotation. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 369–377.] for (part of) this effect. A sample of 300 adults, whose gender beliefs about mental rotation were manipulated experimentally (instructions given: men are better, women are better, or no gender dif...Men outperform women in the Mental Rotation Test (MRT) by about one standard deviation. The present study replicated a gender belief account [Moè, A., & Pazzaglia, F. (2006). Following the instructions! Effects of gender beliefs in mental rotation. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 369–377.] for (part of) this effect. A sample of 300 adults, whose gender beliefs about mental rotation were manipulated experimentally (instructions given: men are better, women are better, or no gender differences exist) had to complete the MRT. Artificially induced gender beliefs affected performance and guessing behavior differently in relation to gender. Women's performance followed the gender belief induction but their guessing behavior remained unaffected. Men's performance, however, remained unaffected but their guessing behavior followed the gender belief induction. These findings suggest that gender beliefs affect men and women differently, and they also suggest that a gender belief account cannot (fully) explain gender differences in mental rotation performance.» weiterlesen» einklappen
Autoren
Klassifikation
DFG Fachgebiet:
Psychologie
DDC Sachgruppe:
Psychologie
Verbundene Forschungsprojekte
Verknüpfte Personen
- Sarah Neuburger
- Mitarbeiter/in
(Institut für Psychologie)
- Claudia Quaiser-Pohl
- Geschäftsführender Leiter
(Institut für Psychologie)