Mental rotation performance in primary school age children: Are there gender differences in chronometric tests?
Cognitive Development. Bd. 28. H. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier 2013 S. 51 - 62
Erscheinungsjahr: 2013
ISBN/ISSN: 0885-2014
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Sprache: Englisch
Doi/URN: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.08.005
Geprüft | Bibliothek |
Inhaltszusammenfassung
In contrast to the well documented male advantage in psychometric mental rotation tests, gender differences in chronometric experimental designs are still under dispute. Therefore, a systematic investigation of gender differences in mental rotation performance in primary-school children is presented in this paper. A chronometric mental rotation task was used to test 449 second and fourth graders. The children were tested in three separate groups each with different stimulus material (animal d...In contrast to the well documented male advantage in psychometric mental rotation tests, gender differences in chronometric experimental designs are still under dispute. Therefore, a systematic investigation of gender differences in mental rotation performance in primary-school children is presented in this paper. A chronometric mental rotation task was used to test 449 second and fourth graders. The children were tested in three separate groups each with different stimulus material (animal drawings, letters, or cube figures). The results show that chronometric mental rotation tasks with cube figures – even rotated in picture plane only – were too difficult for children in both age groups. Further analyses with animal drawings and letters as stimuli revealed an overall gender difference in response time (RT) favoring males, an increasing RT with increasing angular disparity for all children, and faster RTs for fourth graders compared to second graders. This is the first study which has shown consistent gender differences in chronometric mental rotation with primary school aged children regarding reaction time and accuracy while considering appropriate stimuli.» weiterlesen» einklappen
Autoren
Klassifikation
DFG Fachgebiet:
Psychologie
DDC Sachgruppe:
Psychologie
Verbundene Forschungsprojekte
Verknüpfte Personen
- Claudia Quaiser-Pohl
- Mitarbeiter/in
(Institut für Psychologie)
- Sarah Neuburger
- Mitarbeiter/in
(Institut für Psychologie)
- Andrea Schmelter, M.A.
- Mitarbeiter/in
(Institut für Psychologie)