Constructed wetlands support bats in agricultural landscapes
BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY. Bd. 13. H. 2. 2012 S. 196 - 203
Erscheinungsjahr: 2012
ISBN/ISSN: 1439-1791
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Doi/URN: 10.1016/j.baae.2012.02.001
Geprüft | Bibliothek |
Inhaltszusammenfassung
Bats are known to use aquatic habitats as foraging habitats. Agricultural intensification is perceived to be a main reason for the loss of wetlands. However, artificial wetland creation (i.e. the construction of retention-ponds) in the agricultural landscape aiming at water or nutrient retention has recently gained importance. We evaluated to what extent bats use these artificial wetlands as foraging habitats in an agricultural landscape. Bat activity and prey density were compared in matched...Bats are known to use aquatic habitats as foraging habitats. Agricultural intensification is perceived to be a main reason for the loss of wetlands. However, artificial wetland creation (i.e. the construction of retention-ponds) in the agricultural landscape aiming at water or nutrient retention has recently gained importance. We evaluated to what extent bats use these artificial wetlands as foraging habitats in an agricultural landscape. Bat activity and prey density were compared in matched pairs at retention-ponds and neighbouring vineyard sites using stationary bat-detectors and sticky-traps, respectively. To examine if bat activity is related to the number of bat individuals, a thermal infrared imaging camera was used. Pipistrellus pipistrellus, the dominant species, served as an example to assess habitat selection between retention-ponds and vineyards. This was performed by relating foraging activity to the available area available within the potential home-range. Total bat activity and nocturnal prey density were significantly higher above the retention-ponds than above vineyards. High differences of activity levels between the ponds and the respective vineyard sites were found for Pipistrellus spp. (P. pipistrellus and P nathusii) and Myotis spp. (M. daubentonii and M. mystacinus), being about 180 times and 50 times higher above the retention-ponds, respectively. A significant correlation was found between recorded bat activity and the maximum number of bat individuals observed with a thermal infrared imaging camera. When relating foraging activity to habitat availability within the assumed home-range of P. pipistrellus, retention-ponds had on average a higher importance as a foraging habitat than the complete vineyard area although they covered less than 0.1% of its area. This study indicates that artificial wetlands such as retention-ponds provide foraging habitats for bats. Therefore, creation of wetlands in intensively used agricultural landscapes benefits bats. » weiterlesen» einklappen