Inhaltszusammenfassung

Verb–object phrases are usually remembered better if they have been enacted during study than if they have been learned verbally or if one has observed another person enact the phrases. Researchers have explained this well-established enactment effect by assuming that enactment leaves an additional motor code enhancing memory. We assume instead that enactment provokes excellent item-specific processing at the expense of processing relations between items. Thus, if recall were to depend on thi...Verb–object phrases are usually remembered better if they have been enacted during study than if they have been learned verbally or if one has observed another person enact the phrases. Researchers have explained this well-established enactment effect by assuming that enactment leaves an additional motor code enhancing memory. We assume instead that enactment provokes excellent item-specific processing at the expense of processing relations between items. Thus, if recall were to depend on this relational processing that is hindered by enactment, enactment should not be a more effective encoding strategy than observation. We tested this hypothesis by analyzing the recall of sequences of related actions. In two experiments, we found no recall advantage of enactment over observing another person perform, though both encoding tasks were superior to verbal learning. Organization was best after observation. These findings imply that learning by viewing is not inferior to learning by doing.» weiterlesen» einklappen

Autoren

Klassifikation

DDC Sachgruppe:
Psychologie