Starten Sie Ihre Suche...


Durch die Nutzung unserer Webseite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies verwenden. Weitere Informationen
Markus Appel

Prof. Dr. Markus Appel

Institut für Kommunikationspsychologie und Medienpädagogik, Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau

Publikationen
Ergebnisse pro Seite:  10

Appel, Markus; Holt, Peter; Stiglbauer, Barbara et al.

Parents as a resource: Communication quality affects the relationship between adolescents' internet use and loneliness

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE. Bd. 35. H. 6. 2012 S. 1641 - 1648


Appel, Markus; Kronberger, Nicole

Stereotypes and the Achievement Gap: Stereotype Threat Prior to Test Taking

EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW. Bd. 24. H. 4. 2012 S. 609 - 635


Appel, Markus; Maleckar, Barbara

The Influence of Paratext on Narrative Persuasion: Fact, Fiction, or Fake?

HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH. Bd. 38. H. 4. 2012 S. 459 - 484



Holtz, Peter; Appel, Markus

Internet use and video gaming predict problem behavior in early adolescence

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE. Bd. 34. H. 1. 2011 S. 49 - 58


Appel, Markus; Kronberger, Nicole; Aronson, Joshua

Stereotype threat impairs ability building: Effects on test preparation among women in science and technology

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. Bd. 41. H. 7. 2011 S. 904 - 913


Appel, Markus; Richter, Tobias; Mara, Martina et al.

Whom to tell a moving story?: individual differences and persuasion profiling in the field of narrative persuasion.

PERSUASIVE. 2011 S. 6


Gnambs, Timo; Appel, Markus; Batinic, Bernad

Color red in web-based knowledge testing

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR. Bd. 26. H. 6. 2010 S. 1625 - 1631


Bartsch, Anne; Appel, Markus; Storch, Dennis

Predicting Emotions and Meta-Emotions at the Movies: The Role of the Need for Affect in Audiences' Experience of Horror and Drama

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH. Bd. 37. H. 2. 2010 S. 167 - 190


Appel, Markus; Richter, Tobias

Transportation and Need for Affect in Narrative Persuasion: A Mediated Moderation Model

MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY. Bd. 13. H. 2. 2010 S. 101 - 135