Different practice effects for males and females by psychometric and chronometric mental-rotation tests
Journal of Cognitive Psychology. Bd. 31. H. 1. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis 2018 S. 92 - 103
Erscheinungsjahr: 2018
ISBN/ISSN: 2044-592X
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Sprache: Englisch
Doi/URN: 10.1080/20445911.2018.1561702
Geprüft | Bibliothek |
Inhaltszusammenfassung
Gender differences in the psychometric mental-rotation test are usually larger than in the chronometric version. In both tests, practice effects appear for males and females. In this study, 104 participants (54 females, 50 males, age: 21.72 years) completed both tests in counterbalanced order. In the chronometric test, only males reacted and rotated significantly faster after the practice with the psychometric test. A strong practice effect independently of gender was found in the psychometri...Gender differences in the psychometric mental-rotation test are usually larger than in the chronometric version. In both tests, practice effects appear for males and females. In this study, 104 participants (54 females, 50 males, age: 21.72 years) completed both tests in counterbalanced order. In the chronometric test, only males reacted and rotated significantly faster after the practice with the psychometric test. A strong practice effect independently of gender was found in the psychometric test and a gender difference in accuracy in favour of males. Males reported more confidence and females rated the perceived pressure of the time limit of the psychometric test higher than males. Consequently, differences in confidence after the practice could partly explain the gender differences in the improvements of reaction time and rotational speed. Practice from one mental-rotation test on the performance in another seems to be dependent of participants’ gender and the type of the test.» weiterlesen» einklappen
Autoren
Klassifikation
DFG Fachgebiet:
Psychologie
DDC Sachgruppe:
Psychologie
Verknüpfte Personen
- Claudia Quaiser-Pohl
- Mitarbeiter/in
(Institut für Psychologie)
- Martina Rahe
- Mitarbeiter/in
(Universität Koblenz)
- Vera Ruthsatz
- Mitarbeiter/in
(Institut für Psychologie)