Representations of body and space: theoretical concepts and controversies
Cognitive Processing. Bd. 16. H. S1. Springer Science + Business Media 2015 S. 417 - 420
Erscheinungsjahr: 2015
ISBN/ISSN: 1612-4782
Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Sprache: Englisch
Doi/URN: 10.1007/s10339-015-0724-7
Geprüft | Bibliothek |
Inhaltszusammenfassung
Recent years have seen a revived interest in how body and space are represented perceptually and how they affect human cognition and behaviour. Various conceptualisations of body and space have been proposed, alternately stressing neurophysiological, cognitive, or social aspects, but unified approaches are scarce. This short paper will give an overview of different views on body and space. At least three relevant dimensions can be identified in which concepts of body and space may differ: (1)...Recent years have seen a revived interest in how body and space are represented perceptually and how they affect human cognition and behaviour. Various conceptualisations of body and space have been proposed, alternately stressing neurophysiological, cognitive, or social aspects, but unified approaches are scarce. This short paper will give an overview of different views on body and space. At least three relevant dimensions can be identified in which concepts of body and space may differ: (1) perspective: while we conceptually differentiate between body and space perception, they imply each other and the underlying mechanisms overlap. (2) Level: representations of body and space may emerge at different processing levels, from spinal mechanisms guiding reflex movements to those we construct in our imagination. (3) Affect: representations of body and space are closely linked to affect, but this relationship has not received enough attention yet. Despite many empirical findings, our current views on body and space representations remain ambiguous. One problem may lie in the implicit diversity of “bodies” and “spaces” examined in different studies. Specifications of these concepts may help understand existing results better and are important for guiding future research.» weiterlesen» einklappen
Autoren
Klassifikation
DFG Fachgebiet:
Psychologie
DDC Sachgruppe:
Psychologie