Inhaltszusammenfassung

We investigated the performance of the Chemcatcher (R), an aquatic passive sampling device consisting of a sampler body and an Empore (R) disk as receiving phase, when used to monitor acetochlor, alachlor, carbofuran, chlorfenvinphos, alpha-endosulfan, fenpropidin, linuron, oxadiazon, pirimicarb and tebuconazole in 16 Central European streams. The Chemcatcher (R), equipped with an SDB-XC Empore (R) disk, detected seven of the aforementioned pesticides with a total of 54 detections. The time-w...We investigated the performance of the Chemcatcher (R), an aquatic passive sampling device consisting of a sampler body and an Empore (R) disk as receiving phase, when used to monitor acetochlor, alachlor, carbofuran, chlorfenvinphos, alpha-endosulfan, fenpropidin, linuron, oxadiazon, pirimicarb and tebuconazole in 16 Central European streams. The Chemcatcher (R), equipped with an SDB-XC Empore (R) disk, detected seven of the aforementioned pesticides with a total of 54 detections. The time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations reached up to 1 mu g/L for acetochlor and alachlor. Toxic units derived from these concentrations explained reasonably well the observed ecological effects of pesticide stress, measured with the SPEAR index. In a follow-up analysis, we compared the Chemcatcher (R) performance with those of two other sampling systems. The results obtained with the Chemcatcher (R) closely matched those of the event-driven water sampler. By contrast, the TWA concentrations were not significantly correlated with concentrations on suspended particles. We conclude that the Chemcatcher (R) is suitable for the monitoring of polar organic toxicants and presents an alternative to conventional spot sampling in the monitoring of episodically occurring pollutants. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. » weiterlesen» einklappen

Autoren