Starten Sie Ihre Suche...


Durch die Nutzung unserer Webseite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies verwenden. Weitere Informationen

Psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

The American journal of psychiatry. Bd. 170. H. 7. Arlington, Va.: American Psychiatric Assoc. 2013 S. 759 - 767

Erscheinungsjahr: 2013

ISBN/ISSN: 0002-953X ; 1535-7228

Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

Sprache: Englisch

Doi/URN: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12081125

Volltext über DOI/URN

GeprüftBibliothek

Inhaltszusammenfassung


OBJECTIVE Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHOD In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psych...OBJECTIVE Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHOD In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. RESULTS Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%, and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. CONCLUSIONS CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy.» weiterlesen» einklappen

Autoren


Leichsenring, Falk (Autor)
Salzer, Simone (Autor)
Beutel, Manfred E. (Autor)
Herpertz, Stephan (Autor)
Hiller, Wolfgang (Autor)
Hoyer, Jürgen (Autor)
Huesing, Johannes (Autor)
Joraschky, Peter (Autor)
Nolting, Björn (Autor)
Pöhlmann, Karin (Autor)
Ritter, Viktoria (Autor)
Stangier, Ulrich (Autor)
Strauss, Bernhard (Autor)
Stuhldreher, Nina (Autor)
Tefikow, Susan (Autor)
Teismann, Tobias (Autor)
Willutzki, Ulrike (Autor)
Wiltink, Jörg (Autor)
Leibing, Eric (Autor)

Klassifikation


DDC Sachgruppe:
Medizin